• Pictures
  • Queen Elizabeth’s Oath

wrybblog

~ This site is about the "Game of Thrones, not the Game of Thrones of television, rather, the real life Game of Thrones as applicable to the English Throne of Thorns in the quest for a one world government. This site is educational in its application to the history and law of England and Canada with a Scriptural tone involving Queen Elizabeth.

wrybblog

Tag Archives: Inns of court

How Law Is Created

21 Saturday Mar 2015

Posted by Roch LaRochelle in 1- Law of the land, 4- Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Alfed the Great, Balmoral Castle, Bog People, Cana'an law, Canada, Canon Law, Common Law, courts, Danes, debt, Dooms of Alfred, England, English common law, federal government, Game of Thrones, Government, Heresy, Ine Offa Knutus Alfred, Inner City of London, Inns of court, keys to heaven and keys to earth, King George VI, King James Bible, lawyers, Magna Carta 1215, Mercians, national debt, Northumbrians, oath of allegianace to the queen, Papacy, Pentateuch, Queen Elizabeth the Second, Rock LaRochelle, royal assent, thomas jefferson, Throne of Thorns, United States of America, unum sanctum 1302, Vatican, Wickerman

When learning about law it is important to understand how the law is created. The law, as it stands, is purportedly founded on the English common law.

In our current federal system the Governor General commences the session with his speech from the Throne. The speech details what is to be expected from the new session. For example, he might direct the parliament to do something within the federal governments jurisdiction. The bulk of the federal government’s authority is enumerated under s. 91 of the British North America Act 1867.

The government lawyers then get together and draft the legislation. The proposed legislation is then presented to the house of commons as a “Bill”. It could be called the “Finance Act”. When it is introduced the title is read and number assigned then the house carries on with other business.

Sometime later the Bill is read a second time. The second time it is read details are brought out and debated. Once the Bill has been debated it is put to the vote and, as mostly, the majority will approve the Bill. If the Bill is approved then it moves to what is known as “Committee”.

Committee involves an all party group who hammer out the details of the proposed legislation. At times people are permitted to attend to make a presentation. After the committee is finished the Bill goes back to the house for a third and final reading.

Once the Bill is brought back to the house complaints may be made but with a majority government the Bill is pretty much approved. When approved at the third reading it is sent to the upper house or Senate wherein it undergoes the same four processes. When passed the Bill is sent back to the House of Commons then to the Governor General for Royal Assent.

Once Royal Assent has been given the Bill then is entered into the Canada Gazette. Once posted in the Gazette the Bill then becomes law.

When you scrutinize the British North America Bill 1867 it failed to follow those steps and this is why it fails to show Royal Assent on the document itself. This, coupled with the fact the Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982 ought to have been sealed means the so-called constitution of Canada is in peril.

But the so-called constitution of Canada is inconsistent with the Constitution written in Heaven, attached to Elizabeth Judah and to the government by oath to her.

The family unit is the pillar of society

21 Saturday Mar 2015

Posted by Roch LaRochelle in 1- Law of the land, 2- Divorce

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Alfed the Great, Balmoral Castle, Bog People, Cana'an law, Canada, Canon Law, Common Law, courts, Danes, debt, Dooms of Alfred, England, Game of Thrones, Heresy, Ine Offa Knutus Alfred, Inner City of London, Inns of court, James VI/I, judges, keys to heaven and keys to earth, King George VI, King James Bible, lawyers, Lord Privy Seal, Magna Carta 1215, Mercians, national debt, Northumbrians, oath of allegianace to the queen, Papacy, Pentateuch, Picts, Pope, Privy Council Office, Queen Elizabeth the Second, Rome, thomas jefferson, Throne of Thorns, Torah, United States of America, unum sanctum 1302, Vatican, Wickerman

The family unit is the pillar of society. Families flow from our tribal ancestry, most of which has been beaten out of us. There are those whose tribal genealogy has been maintained and for a reason.

What you are about to read should not be construed as being in relation to the commercial-cult activities of “religion” but as a presentation of the facts as set out from readily available sources. One should always conduct their own research in order to verify other’s research, claims, opinions or snake oil including my own aforementioned.

To understand what tribalism is all about you must first look at what a tribe is. Tribes are listed in the Bible under the first book of Moses called; “Genesis”. From Genesis we find the; Israelites, Edomites, Cana’anites, Amorites and other “ites”. What we don’t find is the “Jew” tribe and I provide more on this topic in other posts.

Further into the Bible we find certain prophecies and happenings having a bearing on where we are today. From the Bible we learn of Noah’s son messing with his concubine and Reuben messing with Jacob’s bedroom meaning adulteration of the bloodlines.

The Bible also covers other areas such as divorce. From the Bible we find the man is the head of he household and the wife is the glue holding the family together. If the husband dies the wife is to marry the brother in law under certain circumstances, if the wife leaves the relationship the husband must return her dowry, I assume, for her to live on until she finds another husband. However, when she leaves she can return but if she marries she cannot.

If the wife wants out of the relationship the husband grants her her divorce. If he puts her out then he is to support her but the children always stay with the dad, not with the mother. Why?

In order to qualify to become a son of God you must be a son of man. God created man out of the earth but woman was created from man. To qualify to become a son of God one must be a son, or daughter, of man. When a mother raises the children, to the detriment of the dad, the children become sons and daughters of woman. With very few exceptions those who are sons of women are bastard children who come from prostitutes thus unclean and don’t qualify to become sons of God.

In lands where Elizabeth is the head of state the Laws attached to her come from the Pentateuch. This is because Elizabeth is of Judah who is God’s delegated authority to rule on this earth.

All those who subscribe to an oath of allegiance to Elizabeth instantly become bound to her and the Laws attached to her.

If what I am saying were true then why is there a seeming divorce industry which sprouted up nearly 50 years ago? Why is custody of the children an issue? Well, in some instances custody may very well be an issue however this is where the extended family comes into play. They are there for the support we need in raising families. Under an ancient doctrine of parens patrae the state assumes the right over certain “persons” consistent with the last provision of the papal Bull unum sanctum 1302. This is relevant only to the pagan rulers, perhaps I should say; non-Judahite rulers. Yes, there exists a “Game of Thrones” switching non-Judahite rulers with Judahite rulers. Currently, we enjoy a Judahite ruler in Elizabeth.

In practice we have a variation of what is known as the “code of canon law” which I wrote of in my “Law of the Land” post. This is called the “adversarial system” of law. In certain ecclesiastical circles the adversary is referred to as Satan.

You must experience this system to full come to terms on just how repugnant to the Laws attached to Elizabeth and her subjects.

In the current system the couple goes to their separate lawyers. They tell their story and the lawyer gives some advice and asked if he or she would like to retain his services. Once a lawyer-client relationship is created the lawyer asks the client to fill out a financial statement.

From the client’s financial statement the lawyer can quickly assess the time and cost involved on all issues except divorce. The divorce is automatic after 1 year living separate and apart. The division of property is another issue but the biggest is the custody of the children. The parents are pitted against one another with the lawyer taking the children’s inheritance. The children, for the most part, are raised as bastards.

In the western way of doing things the wife calls the police and complains of assault. The husband automatically goes to jail and does not pass go. While away his possessions are vulnerable. There are restrictions then the children are kept away and the meter starts ticking. If the husband knew the law there would be no domestic violence as all he has to do is grant her a divorce and let her go! No big deal!

In those lands where the police subscribe to an oath to Elizabeth, to commit to such family destruction, runs contrary to their oath of office thus subject to harsh sanctions under the Law. Society authorizes police to carry guns. The citizens have been prohibited from carrying side arms for quite some time. Because of the position in society the police hold they are expected to know the Law. In subscribing to their oaths of office they then know where the Law comes from and those Laws are known as the “Constitution written in Heaven”. We know the police are standing under laws different from the Law so who are they really serving?

When you consider police often call into the dispatch to speak with the on-duty lawyer who then gives the police direction and legal advice. Clearly, since the police had to speak with a lawyer proves they lack legal knowledge. What is seldom observed is “who is pulling the trigger; the lawyer giving direction or the police?”! If you study the history of the law profession you will find they are rooted in English customs and traditions throughout the pagan ruling years. We do need law and the lawyer can prove to be an asset in some instances. However, as the law stands now, it is wholly inconsistent with the Law of the Land so much so one must question the competence of the profession’s governing body as a whole. Whether or not the lawyer he spoke with has an oath to Elizabeth or not is unclear to me however what appears to have happened, in 1937 a Judahite ruler was set upon the English throne (throne of thorns) in George VI. At this time the law ought to have yielded to the Law thereby creating a gradual shift in the legal business.

The Law of the Land comes from Elizabeth who is head of state in Canada. No provision has been made for sub-contracting this obligation therefore all other laws are fictions. While the lawyer may not have subscribed to an oath to Elizabeth the courts sure do therefore they too have an obligation to the Law but you have to force the issue. If not, then the effect would be to have Elizabeth’s authority terminated at once. They can’t have it both ways, take Elizabeth as the head of state yet rely on laws foreign to those Laws attached to their oaths of office.

Information on the so-called Constitutions of Canada are under another head and well worth noting and I will give you a couple of examples. The British North America Act 1867 was never given Royal Assent. When Elizabeth came to Ottawa, April 17th., 1982 to sign the Charter of Rights and Freedoms she used a pen. Unfortunately, someone of her stature usually relies upon a “signet ring”. A signet ring is the authority of the holder and is pressed into wax melted into the parchment. That failed to happen.

Legal work is not for the faint of heart. If you are insecure standing before a judge but insist on doing so I would suggest you wear your best brown pants as you will probably need them. If you have legal problems and would like to try this method I am not so sure a lawyer would apply this method but one could try. However, using Elizabeth’s Law could affect the course of the legal proceeding and done outside the court. Nonetheless, when in doubt I would suggest you get a lawyer, study and live to battle another day.

If you would like to conduct your own legal proceedings but find the courts intimidating you might like to sit in on court proceedings. You can see criminal proceedings, civil proceedings and trials unless there is a court order preventing the public. The courts are free to attend and you can get the feel of the room, how the lawyers present how the judge does her thing etc. Watching and appearing are two different things. Technically your paperwork should speak for you.

Templates for court are available

Donations would be appreciated

What Is The Law of the Land?

20 Friday Mar 2015

Posted by Roch LaRochelle in 1- Law of the land, 2- Divorce, 3- Money, 4- Politics, 5- Health, 6- Occult / Ritual, 7- Articles

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abraham isaac jacob david zedekiah George VI Eliabeth, Alfed the Great, Balmoral Castle, Bog People, Cana'an law, Canada, Canon Law, Common Law, courts, Danes, debt, democracy, divorce, Dooms of Alfred, England, Game of Thrones, Government, Heresy, Ine Offa Knutus Alfred, Inner City of London, Inns of court, Israel, James VI/I, judges, keys to heaven and keys to earth, King George VI, King James Bible, lawyers, Lord Privy Seal, Magna Carta 1215, Mercians, military, monarch, national debt, Northumbrians, oath of allegianace to the queen, Papacy, Pentateuch, Picts, Pope, Privy Council Office, Queen Elizabeth the Second, Rock LaRochelle, Rome, royal assent, subjects of the queen, thomas jefferson, Throne of Thorns, Torah, United States of America, unum sanctum 1302, Vatican, Wickerman, will of the people

Before we can consider what is meant by; “the Law of the Land”, we must first answer the question; “who owns the land?”.

Like the so-called “climate change”, we can use all sorts of facts and figures yet absent the owner’s manual and repair manual for planet earth how do we know what the climate ought to be. Other factors could include influencing weather through artificial means such as removal of the rain forests etc.

If any mere mortal claims they own the land then it would be up to them to produce the manuals and prove they own the land by showing us how they created it by repeating the process!

We all need law and order but the question is; “whose law and what order?”. In a democracy you supposedly have the will of the people through the politician. The law is enforced by the military. In a democracy the elected is put into power through public appeal. Monarchy operates through merit. You have to do your job faithfully, diligent and honestly.

One may also ask who constitute the people from whose will is being applied? After all, once you vote you have no say until the next election.

Who owns Canada? Who owns the 13 Colonies? How many countries are in debt crisis and to whom? What happens when those “indebted” countries goes bankrupt, what assets are auctioned off?

Canada, fortunately, holds no debt! “Why?” you ask? Well, in order to draw that conclusion we first must look at who the head of state is. The Colonial head of state is the president of that corporation. In Canada Elizabeth the Queen is head of state. Those who are employed with the various government authorities subscribe to an oath of allegiance to her. And just who is Elizabeth?

In order to understand the importance Elizabeth is given, on the currency, image in government buildings and the laws are given in her name as “Royal Assent”. Elizabeth’s representative here is the Governor General, and other conspicuousness; we must look at her genealogy.

From her genealogy we find her dating back to the Patriarchs; Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Zedekiah, George VI and Elizabeth. So what does this mean?

When we look at our ancestors we find a certain God whom those aforementioned followed. The Laws flowing from this God are set out in a brief compilation called the “Bible”. There are over 20 different Bibles. One would suspect someone inclined to want to make lots of money could invent a religion therefore the requirement for an official cult, I mean religion. I would certainly place the King James Version of 1611. What is the importance of the King James Version?

King James was James the I from Scotland brought in to sit on the English Throne in 1603. Being of Judah the Pentateuch, or “Five Scrolls of Moses” would be in play as Judah is commanded not to add to or diminish from the Law. So Judah must be important?

Judah is of the 4th born of Jacob who would later be renamed “Israel” by God. Jacob had 12 sons and one daughter; “Dinah”. Esau was the boys and girl’s uncle.

The story goes; the tribes of Israel wanted to be governed by men thus, God gave them judges. The judges proved corrupt then our forefathers wanted to be ruled by a king thus Judah was appointed as prophesied at Genesis 49:10.

But we don’t have the Laws set out in the Pentateuch so what is happening? Well, before we can go that route we have to look at ourselves and the legal-judicial system. The next obvious questions is; “if the judicial-legal system is other than it ought to be then how has this come to pass?”. Who controls the political-legal-judicial systems? Lawyers! What is so special about lawyers?

To understand who the lawyer is one must look at the history of our political-legal-judicial systems inherited from England. This is referred to the “English Common Law”. Just what is the English Common Law?

The English Common Law has its roots in ancient England from about 300-600 common era. During this period there were several tribes throughout the land. There were the; Picts, Anglos, Saxons, Danes, Mercians, Northumbrians, and many others. Along with the many tribes were their many customs and traditions.

We may recognize such customs as “Wickerman” and the “Bog People” as part of such customs. But some laws conflicted with others. Within these various tribes there would be a tribal elder or chief or king. Every once in a while, or as the case may be, the head would meet with the people by the river, the big rock, the ancient elm or some other landmark where issues were raised and news shared. Trials were also held.

Around 597 Augustine was sent to establish the “monastic movement” with the conversion of the tribes to Christianity of the, I assume; “pagans”. Remember, the tribes had their own beliefs and Rome brought theirs giving them something they didn’t have before. Over the next few hundred years the various tribes were concentrated eventually into a single significant or backed king-head. Such king-heads would include; Ine, Alfred, Knutus, Offa and others. This was the start of the one-rule government and spanned several hundred years.

Leading up to the so-called Norman Invasion Alfred personally looked at all the laws of all the different jurisdictions and enumerated the best of all into what would come to be known as the “Dooms of Alfred”.
To digress for a moment, I would like to provide an interpretation from what I have researched. The kings were united as in “new world order”. These kings had their laws joined. What do you have? You have; “United” “King” “Doom” or the laws of the kings united! Thus, the “Union Jack” is actually the Flag of the United Kingdom.

What do the Dooms of Alfred say? Well, they make provision for what one would expect from non-scriptural tribes. Off the top, one penalty was to provide a pig to the damaged party while pig is taboo not only to the Israelite, Edomite but the Islamic as well. Another interesting point about the Dooms of Alfred, and it was right over my head when I first read them.

Seems on second look Thomas Jefferson was correct. He stated the Dooms of Alfred the Great were forged. He pointed out the Dooms themselves were contrary to the Ancient Scripture but there was an addition of a few passages of Leviticus and Exodus and disregards the rest of the Torah.

Excluding the select passages of Scripture the other laws formed what was known as the “common law”. Since Rome, for all intents and purposes, uses, or manipulates, some Scripture the common law didn’t. Also, it was the common law that permitted the ecclesiasts to establish themselves.

About the time of Alfred the witan or “witanagamot” was invented. The witan was the forerunner of the Imperial Parliament and co-operated with the ecclesiasts. In fact, one of the first orders of business was to exempt the clergy from taxation.

In regard to Roman tax exemption one would be well advised to review the Concordat between Von Papen and Pacelli, July 1933. Some of the highlights include; a priest’s habit is a military uniform, Vatican has free and full commercial authority as a separate country, is to be protected by the state, the contract goes on forever-and-a-day.

What happened in 1066 was the infusion of another race or tribe not unlike diluting the population with a particular religion. There were no battles per se as systems existed. There was law and order and didn’t want to upset the balances more then the influx was testing. Besides, the Normans didn’t have their own laws and were mostly illiterate.

This was the start of the papal revolution with the appearance of the schools of higher learning and ecclesiastic courts. I would assume the papal courts were more efficient and had a long established system of rule.

Turning to 1213 we have King John robbing from the parishes to the point the papacy eventually brought John to his knees causing him to sign an agreement wherein his signet ring was passed to the papacy. The signet ring of a pagan ruler is known as the “key to earth” whilst the signet ring of the Judahite ruler is referred to as the “key to heaven” thus when pope has both keys he holds the temporal and spiritual powers.

In 1215 Magna Carta comes about. I believe this was a come-on invented to say; “look; London is private property”. And we know the inner city of London is still a city-state. As time progresses the various law companies spring up; Grey’s Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, Inner Temple, Middle Temple and Temple Bar. These are where the lawyers owe allegiance. If you conduct some research into the Roman Empire you may find it was Cana’anite. Further research yields the Hittites were of Cana’anite descent. They were fierce warriors and the money masters then and now. It was Esau who became Edom when he did what he was commanded not to do; he mixed with the Cana’anites as described in Genesis 36.

Because the Vatican gained control of the signet ring of the rulers, and as its empire grew, there rose a need for management. The first step was in 1068 with the invention of the Lord Keeper of the Seal. This position was staffed with ecclesiasts for many years. In 1307 the office of Lord Privy Seal is invented. The Lord Privy Seal is the one who is privy to the ruler’s signet ring or seal. The Privy Council Offices are under the authority of this office.

Backing up to 1302 we come to unum sanctum. This is a papal bull which proclaims the pope owns the kings their armies (police) and human creatures, or “persons”. Remember the time of man? It was not until three hundred years before Judah is placed on the throne. And, yes, we do have the “Game of Thrones” going on! You have seen how the pagan kings were unified then brought under control of the papacy. That’s well and good for the pagans but what happens with Judah?

With Judah there are certain undertaking it has no option but to fulfill. One allowance missing from the Torah is the authority of Judah to delegate or sub-contract its authority to any other. Yet, this is exactly what has happened in the case of Elizabeth.

Have you ever wondered why King George VI died February 6th. 1952 yet her coronation was some 16 months later? The reason for the anomaly is on June 2 1953 she agreed to incorporate as HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND. Up until then she was Queen of Judah. On June 2nd., she gave up her signet ring (key to heaven) to Vatican.

So, what you have here is a donor-trustee arrangement. But with Judah the rules change! We are no longer under pagan or Roman rule, rather, as trustee, the pope must ensure the Laws attached to Judah are diligently applied. This latest run of Judahite rulers began with Judah George VI in 1937. How does the papacy manage Judahite affairs? He has his contractors.

Who are the papal contractors? The papal contractors are those who take it upon themselves to set up their own fiefdom called “government” through the scheme of “democracy”. The democratic process is pretty much a snare, a social contract and when you participate in the voting ceremony you become enfranchised and placed on the draft lists. If you vote you have no say in what government does however as previous provided, those who work for government take an oath to the Queen.

In taking an oath to the Queen they agree to the Laws attached to her. Therefore, we have a double play here. On the one part the contractors are in contempt of the God whose Constitution written in Heaven they pledged to uphold while on the other part they are portraying the trustee as fallible in failing to police its contractors. For a contractor, of the Catholic belief, who tarnishes the good; name, reputation, dignity and perfection of his eminence, under the Cana’an of the law, is guilty of “heresy” to which an inquisition to discover the breadth and depth of the alleged heresy would normally be called by the appropriate ecclesiastical authority.

Getting back to the Law of the Land and who owns the land there are possibly several answers however two come to mind. Dealing with the animal, brute force, might is right, king of the castle until toppled.

Dealing with the spiritual side we find the superior force in command through the Constitution written in Heaven. With Judah the land belongs to God and is not to be sold forever. Therefore, under the rule of Judah the land belongs to God and the Law of the Land is found in the Torah.

God delegated His Right to Rule to Judah.

Satan created Vatican to represent his interests.

Judah gave its authority to Vatican.

Satan receives God’s authority from Judah through Vatican.

Satan is God of this world and the council of Cardinals are Gods. I wouldn’t go so far as saying they are all Gods but would say genii!

How can anyone fail to see the shear brilliance in what has been accomplished? Stunning! Absolutely stunning!

Categories

  • 1- Law of the land (9)
  • 13 Colonies-In God We Trust (2)
  • 2- Divorce (2)
  • 3- Money (2)
  • 4- Politics (3)
  • 5- Health (2)
  • 6- Occult / Ritual (3)
  • 7- Articles (1)
  • Anishinaabe Genocide (1)
  • Anishinabe (2)
  • Canadian Taxation (1)
  • Gord Downie (1)
  • New World Order, Old World Concentration (1)
  • Treaties (2)

Recent Posts

  • Heresy
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools
  • Anishinaabe; Genocide or High Treason?
  • NEW WORLD ORDER, Old World Concentration
  • Chaney Wenjack Secret Path
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools
  • Anishinabe Treaty Process
  • How Law Is Created
  • The family unit is the pillar of society
  • What Is The Law of the Land?
January 2021
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« May    

Archives

  • May 2017
  • October 2016
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4 other followers

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Archives

  • May 2017
  • October 2016
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015

Categories

  • 1- Law of the land
  • 13 Colonies-In God We Trust
  • 2- Divorce
  • 3- Money
  • 4- Politics
  • 5- Health
  • 6- Occult / Ritual
  • 7- Articles
  • Anishinaabe Genocide
  • Anishinabe
  • Canadian Taxation
  • Gord Downie
  • New World Order, Old World Concentration
  • Treaties

Recent Posts

  • Heresy
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools
  • Anishinaabe; Genocide or High Treason?
  • NEW WORLD ORDER, Old World Concentration
  • Chaney Wenjack Secret Path

  • 4,877

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy